home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- There has been one or two messages that I have read hinting
- about this capibility but none that I have seen stating
- very clearly that an rlogin type is needed. So now I'm
- saying it. How about an rlogin type. This would look
- very similar to telnet type.
-
- rloginaddress
- rlogin://[user@]hostport
-
- hostport
- host[:port]
-
- host
- hostname | hostnumber
-
- user
- xalphas
-
- If a client cannot process an rlogin then it can be treated as
- a regular telnet type. This is basically just a convienence
- routine, saving the user from typing in a username. I wouldn't
- request this if it wasn't so easy to implement.
-
- Well how about it???
-
- :lou
-